Thursday, 23 January 2025

My beginner's guide to what different types of telescope are available for amateur astronomy

Newly arrived to my blog? Want to know more about me before you dive into my posts? Why not visit the home page first and start your exploration from there: 

https://undersouthwestskies.blogspot.com/2025/01/welcome-to-my-new-astronomyastrophotogr.html

And welcome. Welcome to 'UnderSouthWest Skies'. Thanks for stopping by. I hope you find the experience worthwhile. This blog post has been written from my own 'beginner perspective' after doing lots of reading on the topic below.  In getting my head around it all, I may have got odd bits slightly wrong; but, like you, I am on a leaning journey, so please forgive any unintentional errors.  Meanwhile, clear skies to you. Take care and thanks for visiting   Steve aka PlymouthAstroBoy 


How does a telescope work - the simple version!

I hope! 

Basic question – “What is a telescope?”

Its an optical tube assembly (OTA). It uses lenses or mirrors or both to view distant objects. Gathered light is concentrated and brought to focus at an eyepiece. All these densely packed light photons in a small area show an image. An eyepiece at this point on a focuser shows the image collected. Every telescope has similar components in its construction – optics tube, mount, objective lens, eyepiece, focuser, diagonal and an internal mirror/lens system that directs light inputs.

 

Copyright: Spaceplace NASA


Basic question 2 – “What are the different types of telescopes available to us?”

Every type of OTA controls entering light to the objective lens in different ways. If you want to buy a telescope you HAVE TO understand the differences between each type, their advantages, and disadvantages before deciding the type you are going to get.

Traditionally there are three types of telescopes – refractor, reflector and compound.

What follows now is written by a beginner, me, for other beginners (you) - i.e. those of you thinking of getting your first telescope. I stress now that I may not have all this correct but I have done my best. I am trying to give a ‘one stop shop’ so to speak. The aim is to give an overview and start you on your ‘thinking journey’ towards buying your first telescope.

 So, lets jump straight in: But before I do so a polite note: the illustrations below are just that, illustrations, not particular recommendations! 

And a tip: if you are a beginner to astronomy and thinking of buying a first telescope, I suggest you read this blog post first and afterwards come back to this one. The first blog to read is https://undersouthwestskies.blogspot.com/2025/01/beginners-guide-to-buying-your-first.html

 

Copyright: Sky and Telescope

1.       Refractor telescopes

First type to be invented, they employ a glass lens at the end of a tube to obtain a magnified view of the sky. One of the best collections of old refractor telescopes I have seen was at the Galileo Museum in Florence. Stunning instruments.

Anyway, refractors are popular with many appealing qualities and are a good first telescope option. They have a lens at the front of the optical tube and an eyepiece at the back. Achromat lens systems involving two lenses are not colour dependent and bring all coloured light to a focus. However, Apochromatic lens systems involving four pieces of glass, are more expensive and give a far superior image quality and focus. Generally, refractors deliver sharper and brighter images per inch of aperture than other designs because the lenses are more efficient and other designs ave a secondary mirror up front that blocks some incoming light.

Celestron Advanced VX 6" refractor Telescope 
Copyright: Rother Valley Optics 

Watch an animation of light passing through a refractor.  https://skyandtelescope.org/wp-content/uploads/Refractor-animation-720p.mp4

 

Advantages:

·        Lightweight

·        Easy to use

·        Generally more rugged because their lenses are less likely to fall out of alignment  - Optical tube is sealed from elements

·        Sharp views

·        Require little maintenance

·        Interchangeable eyepieces offer varying magnifications

·        Good portability

·        Good as ‘grab and go’ instruments because unlike other telescope types, refractors reach the temperature of the outside air more rapidly and are therefore ‘ready to work’ far more quickly

·        They don’t need collimation (lens alignment)

·        Better at image contrasting because no light is blocked as it passes through the lenses. This is much better for observing planets and double stars where good image contrast is required to be able to see finer details

·        Good for seeing the solar system, bright deep space objects (DSO’s), planets and double stars

·         

Disadvantages:

·        Aperture is king – so very large lens refractors are expensive and often unmanageable for beginner amateurs – for amateurs, refractor apertures will be between 60 – 150mm in diameter

·        Optics quality affects price and cheap refractors are often disappointing, so refractors tend to be expensive than other telescope types

·        Refractors can suffer from something called ‘false colour’ – a bright star looks somewhat rainbow tinted and blurry rather than a sharp point of light.

·        The longer the refractor tube, the higher the pivot point needs to be on the tripod and the taller and heavier tripod you require (remember the eyepiece is at the end of the optical tube).

 

Other points to consider with refractors include:

·        Small refractors < than 90mm are best suited for wide sky views. Planets will appear small. Brighter galaxies and nebula will be visible under dark sky conditions.

·        Larger refractors >100mm diameter will give lots of deep space object viewing – galaxies, globular clusters, and nebulae. Surface colours will be seen on planets such as Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Sharp lunar views with good detailed definition on craters and mountain ridges will be seen.

A decent refractor on a sturdy mount and tripod will give thrilling stargazing experiences for many years.

 

How a refractor telescope works: Copyright Liverpool Astronomical Society

 

2.       Reflective telescopes

The second type of telescope, a reflector, was by all accounts invented by Issac Newton and so they tend to be called Newtonian reflectors. Reflectors use large mirrors instead of lenses. An open tube at the front and a curved mirror at the bottom of the optic tube (the primary mirror). Entering light is reflected back inside the tube to an angled smaller, flat secondary mirror, near the top of the open tube. And it is here that we find the eyepiece. This allows apertures to be far bigger than refractor scopes.

Reflector telescopes can be mounted on tripod (smaller models) or on a rotating base which sits on the floor (for bigger models and these are known as Dobsonian telescopes. These tend to be the best value for money and give rewarding deep sky views. Dobsonian telescopes are simple with no wires or batteries. You point the telescope at what it is you want to see. You can add GOTO controls.

Skywatcher skyliner 200p Dobsonian Telescope
Copyright: Tring Astronomy Centre 

Advantages:

·        Dobsonian telescopes tend to offer the best value for money overall as they reflect true light as opposed to bending it. Tend to be least expensive

·        give good sharp and contrasty deep sky views;

·        Best for viewing fainter distant objects such as galaxies and nebulae

·        Easy to adjust and modify

·        Simple with no wires or batteries

·        Some models can have motors and GOTO facilities added at later date

·        Work well in focal length ranges from F/4 to F/8 – they deliver wide fields of view relative to their aperture

 

Disadvantages:

·        They are sensitive to bumping and so mirrors may need regular adjusting – collimation – as the mirrors occasionally fall out of alignment. For beginners collimation can sometimes be frustrating

·        They can be heavy and bulky – awkward to move and store

·        The largest models may require a set of steps to reach the eyepiece viewer when viewing objects towards the sky zenith

·        They can suffer from the ‘coma effect’ where stars at the very edge of the field of view look long and thin

·        Being open tubes they can be great dust collectors if you are not careful – so make sure wne storing them they have their dust cap on

·        For beginners, they can be confusing because they flip and invert the image being viewed – so if viewing the moon – that bit of surface being viewed is flipped left to right and, actually being viewed upside down!

Watch an animation of light passing through a reflector. https://skyandtelescope.org/wp-content/uploads/Reflector-animation-720p.mp4

For really good briefings about Newtonion and Dobsonion reflectors visit these sites:

https://meteorwatch.org/newtonian-telescopes-simple-guide-reflector-telescopes/

https://meteorwatch.org/dobsonian-telescopes/

 

SkyWatcher StarQuest- 130P f/5 parabolic newtonian reflector telescope
Copyright: First Light Optics 


How a Newtonian reflector telescope works: copyright Liverpool Astronomical Society

 

 

My own little Dobsonian telescope A SkyWatcher 100mm table top scope which is brilliant

3.       Catadioptric (compound) telescopes

Catadioptric Telescopes have a combination of mirrors which have a hole in the middle of them and lenses. Light is sent back through a hole in the main mirror. Invented in the 1930’s, like refractor telescopes, the front end is pointed skywards and you look into the telescope at the rear end via interchangeable eyepieces. They give a comparatively more magnified view for a given size of eyepiece. Basically, they combine the best characteristics of a refractor and reflector telescope. Two types are Schmidt-Cassegrains and Maksutov-Cassegrains.

Watch an animation of light passing through a compound telescope. https://skyandtelescope.org/wp-content/uploads/Compound-animation-720p.mp4


Advantages:

·        Short and compact (shorter in length) so easier to store and easier to ‘grab and go’

·        Probably the best combination of optics

·        Can use lighter mounts – so overall easier to transport as a set up

·        A sealed unit so no dust traps

·        Maksutov-Cassegrain or Schmidt- Cassegrain telescopes give excellent views of planets and moon; with good sky conditions, they show clearly the rings of Saturn and colour bands of Jupiter. Even the polar caps on Mars! With a long focal length in a very compact tube, they are excellent for all near and deep space viewing except for distant deep space objects

·        Good first choice of telescope for many as they are good compromise between large aperture of reflectors and manageable size  

 

Disadvantages:

·        Comparatively heavy

·        Need periodic tweaking to ensure mirrors are lined up – collimation again.

·        Larger magnifications mean that objects being viewed will move more quickly out of view – so they are best with electronic tracking mounts

·        Most Schmidt-Cassegrains have an F/10 focal ratio so they don’t always produce wide low power fields of view.  

·        Cost wise – aperture for aperture, catadioptric telescopes lie midway between refractors and reflectors.

·        Take a long time to cool down to the outside night time temperature so they aren’t a ‘grab and go’ type telescope in that sense

 

How a Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope works: copyright Celestron

 

 I hope this helps you gain some understanding of the different types. There are some excellent YouTube tutorials about different types of telescope for beginners as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI5id4xksSU  Anything by Trevor Jones is always well worth watching! As is anything produced by Rother Valley Optics in my humble opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga0lgrSPxh0

And a simple readable summary - try this one: https://www.widescreen-centre.co.uk/blog/best-telescopes-for-beginners.html

Next linked blog post? https://undersouthwestskies.blogspot.com/2025/01/my-beginners-guide-to-choosing-mount.html

 Footnote: As is the case for all websites and any suppliers or equipment manufacturers I mention - I am not gaining in anyway - not financially, not in gaining page views, not in gaining equipment to test. Nothing! I do not blog to gain in any way. 

No comments:

Post a Comment