Sunday, 2 February 2025

Astro-modifying my Canon 800D - should I?

 Getting my DSLR camera astro-modified

When I heard that after so many years, and over 2500 astro conversions, Andy Ellis of ‘Astronomiser’ was hanging up his tools – I immediately did some research and reached a decision. 

My research was – ‘what are the advantages and disadvantages of astro modifying my camera’ and I have sort of summarised my findings below.

The decision? I am posting my DSLR to Andy ASAP, having got one of his last conversion slots. he came highly recommended and I haven't been able to find someone else in the Uk at the moment who would do it. Ideally I wanted to wait another year ro so until I was better at post editing but, as is always the case, I've decided to jump right in and get it done now. 😕

So, what is astro modifying a DSLR all about?

I have a Canon 800D. It is several years old now. It has become my astrophotography camera. I tend to use a compact Canon digital zoom for my daily photography as it is compact, easy to slip into a pocket on my travels and takes really good photos.

Copyright: Astronomiser Andy Ellis 
And this is why I could never ever do such a modification myself, despite several good YouTube tutorials on line! 

Now my Canon camera, like other Canons, have a fitted filter that cuts out swathes of red light at a particular frequencies (about 75% of the light in the red band I think) – and this can really affect the Hydrogen Alpha band of emission nebulae. Thus to have any chance of capturing the red in nebulae etc, then I have to do lots of long exposures - making an astrophotography session, very long! 

Remove the filter and the cameras red response gets improved by a whopping x4 in this Hydrogen Alpha band, thus reducing the amount of imaging time required. The mod will also improve my milky way photos, shots of star forming regions and enhance any hydrogen alpha in galaxies.  

Copyright: Astronomiser Andy Ellis
I know that if I did this, after re-assembling the camera - i'd discover bits 'left over'! 

So, I am getting the rear filter removed. This is a UV/IR cut and colour correcting filter so I am told. Hence its an ‘IR Mod’. They key here is its removal stops the colour correcting bit which is where the 75% of light loss occurs.

At least I think this is right. As always, I flag up my long-standing caveat – I’m a beginner at astrophotography and so I may make mistakes, for which I apologise! If you think I have anything wrong, drop me a comment and I will correct it immediately. Remember, this is a blog written by a beginner, for beginners!

Back to my astro-mod. I think Andy will remove this rear filter and reposition the sensor to correct for the loss of the filter glass.

Copyright: Astronomiser Andy Ellis 


So, lets move onto the advantages of doing this mod – I have already raised a few:

·        Removal of the filter will allow more sensitivity light to the Hydrogen Alpha band  - easier to capture faint red wavelengths!

·        Increased sensitivity means I can capture more detailed vibrant images of DSO’s in shorter imaging sessions - more accurate colours

·        I will be able to do better narrowband imaging

·        With shorter imaging time, my images should suffer from fewer stars overwhelming the main DSO I am imaging

·        I can still use my  existing DSLR lenses and Zenithstar 61ii small refractor

Disadvantages of doing the mod:

·        My camera will now capture all images in the red spectrum and so I will need to make white balance adjustments if I want to use the camera for daylight shots OR I can use a clip in astronomic OWB filter to compensate. I read somewhere that setting a WB of 2500K for daylight photography will work but only time will tell.

·        an astro-modified camera might struggle with capturing detail in bright objects like the moon due to its increased sensitivity to red light. 

·        For capturing lunar details or wide-field shots with a high dynamic range, an unmodified camera might be preferable. 

·        I may lose automatic focusing on my lenses (not an issue for me as I tend to use them all in manual focusing mode at night)

·        The costs of the astronomic filter and conversion

·        It will void my factory warranty (but that was already out of date anyway)

·        I am going to get post editing frustration as I will need to do colour corrections to my milky way landscapes – they will have a purplish hue! So, I will need to re-write my cheat notes about post editing work flow.


Is the modification worth doing? 

Jury out on that as far as I make out on various forums. For everyone who says yes, someone says no! Many say invest in a tracker instead for any landscape photography and don’t mod the camera.

I have decided to take the plunge. If nothing else, it will force me to master colour correcting techniques in Affinity Photo!

Below are some of the videos I looked at: 




AstroOnBudget





PhotoPills 


Kamil Pekala

NOTE: The videos above are just ones I watched. There are plenty of others out there which detail the pro's and cons' of astro-modifying your DSLR.  I am not recommending these channels as such, although I will admit that Kamil's, Nico's, Alyn's and Nightscapes - have been channels that I have found to be really informative. 


No comments:

Post a Comment