Sunday, 27 April 2025

The EQM 35 pro

 I have rarely ever been in the right place at the right time. Until now.  

I was scrolling my Facebook astronomy/astrophotography groups looking for tips and information about something else, when I spotted a post offering a skywatcher mount free to a good home or club. 

I waited for an hour or so and no one had commented, so I took the plunge and contacted the gentleman, who as it so happened, lived relatively local to me. 

And so I now own a third hand EQM 35 Pro mount and tripod. The only stipulation, if I don't want it or I outgrow it, I pass it on for free and of course, it goes without saying, look after it.  I did offer money for it but it was politely refused. I did offer to donate to a charity of the gentleman's choice but it was politely declined and I was told I was THE charity! 

Now, as it so happens I am looking to buy a new mount. I've been considering three - the SWSA gti; the EQM 35 Pro and the EQ-AL55i and I had a very productive visit to a well known astronomy retailer two days ago just before discovering this Facebook post today. I needed to buy some bits and pieces, a new power tank etc and so I so I did spend some money on various upgrades etc at the retailer, so they didn't lose out. If the EQM doesn't fit into the motorhome, then I will be passing it on and probably getting an EQ-AL55i or even a HEQ5 from the retailer.   

So, what have I been so generously gifted? 

The first and second owners have only used it a few times. It is pretty much pristine with very few signs of any wear and tear. The Declination - rotates freely without any stickiness or slowing. Rotating the RA axis is stiffer. When balancing the payload, if the counterweight is pushed to the lower end of the support bar then it rotates freely but move the CW further up the bar and the rotation is less free. 

Its the grease used by Skywatcher. And the fact that it doesn't use bearings, just bushes. There are YouTube tutorials about how to free up the RA a little - it involves removing the polar-scope, finding three little grub screws; loosening them 1/16th of an inch at most. An aluminium disc can then be removed giving access to the 'nut' which can be loosened a tad. That will allow freer rotation as along as I'm careful not to introduce any 'play'. 

However, I don't feel brave enough to do this. The mount is a generous long term loan - it has to be passed on. I don't want to mess this up. I understand the contract! 

So far, I have managed to link up my ASIair mini via an EQMOD cable - i.e. not using the accompanying SynScan handset. I can make the mount slew in all directions. I can't get it to communicate using a usb cable into the control box. The handset seems very hit and miss despite following the instruction book very carefully. 

I tried it out last night before the clouds closed in and some issues emerged rapidly. 

1. I could not get it to line up with Polaris, however hard I tried. I lost forty minutes there until I worked out that the little spirit level bubble on the mount is broken. So when I was levelling up the tripod using it, I was way out! On a completely level surface, the bubble is well to the back edge - nowhere near the circle, never mind the centre of it! So, I am levelling the tripod before the mount goes on, using a longer spirit level. Irritating but only in a very minor way. 

2. After an SWSA 2i on a WO wedge, this one is so easy to polar align using the ASIair. Oh my. Very small precise adjustments. Complete revelation. 

3. Switching on Dec for the first time in the AA mini - some new learning when calibrating - west and east steps and then north and south steps (new to me) and then backlash steps? And then the clouds closed in before I could do any more! 

4. I'm not completely sure whether it is going to its nominated target accurately enough - I tried for M3 and it seemed to be slightly off. But then I haven't used the space atlas icon before in AA so that's a new one on me too. More learning to do over next few nights. 

The EQMOD cable is a loose fit and so I may need to get a new one. I need to get a longer dovetail bar for my zenithstar 61ii so that I can do better Dec balancing. I need a small finder plate bracket to attach to the scope to hold the AA mini. Before, I've attached it to the tripod.  

So, plenty of new learning. Reviews about the EQM are generally sound - although clearly people are unhappy about rotational issues and the knock on effect in guiding when using an ASIair.  I need to update the software/firmware. I'm not sure how old the mount is but I suspect its three - five years old.  

It uses the plug in polar illuminator - yep that one - from the SWSA2i - the feeble red diode one! But that is a minor, minor niggle. 

I will let you all know how I get on. I feel very privileged and a great weight of responsibility to get this EQM 35 Pro mount working properly; to make best use of it. I am its 'custodian' for a time. 







Tuesday, 8 April 2025

Taking milky way images during an 85% full moon.

 I nearly didn't go. The wind was strong, gusty and chilly - up to 35 mph. The moon was at 85% full moon. The landscape was moonlit. The milky way was at an awkward position, only just above a distant cliff line. 

All excuses 😂. In reality, an astrophotographer should be able to cope with anything nature throws at them! Only, I'm a beginner. I am still trying to figure out the art of composition and how to navigate my DSLR camera buttons in the dark without using a head torch! 

Such an amateur 😆

Then there is this whole post editing malarkey. Regular readers of this blog will have heard my regular lament before 'post editing is a dark, dark art; the work of the Devil'!  I take two steps forward, celebrate and then discover, in reality, I have taken three backwards. I then metaphorically howl! 

One of the issues is this - how can the same photographic light image be processed in so many different ways ...... and which is the most accurate version .......and how do I know? 😱

Anyway, here are the images from one night down at one of my favourite places, Wembury Beach, on the south Devon coast. It is where I go to try and learn and perfect my practice! 

The photo info: 

  • Canon 800D and Samyang 14mm F/2.8 lens
  • Intervalometer
  • SWSA 2i tracker with William Optics wedge
  • Benbro CF tripod
Shooting data: 
  • 60" x 10 at ISO 1600 F/2.8 for sky; 
  • foregrounds ISO 800 F/2.8 and varying between 15 - 90"
Post editing: 

Sequator, GraXpert and Affinity Photo were my goto programs for post editing. 

I haven't done a post yet on how I edit my milky way images because I don't feel confident about my skills and therefore have nothing to offer you fellow newbies/beginners at this moment in time.  

As I have said in one of my first posts on this new blog, I bit off more than I could chew. Like an idiot on steroids, for some insane thinking that I can't fathom out now, I decided to take on astronomy, astrophotography, using a DSLR on manual for the first time and then several new post editing programs (SIRIL, Sequator, Deepskystacker, GraXpert AND Affinity Photo) ALL AT THE SAME TIME! 

What was I thinking? 😯


I think the foreground came out fine but the sky - one too many curves and levels adjustments me think! 

Difficulties blending sky and foreground together regarding brightness, contrast, shadows and exposure

I processed the sky in SIRIL on this one and promptly lost where the stars bit got saved on my laptop - hence the absence of stars. I'm still searching for the 'stars' bit pf the star recomposition process! 

Was pushing my learning here - selfies, using an orb - trying to get the landscape exposed correctly etc! I messed up the sky section completely! 
On the bright side - I am slowly getting to grips with how to do 'sky replacement' in Affinity Photo. I now have the simple basics. Just need to learn how to do all the refinements and brush work


Nope! Can't explain this either but I like it! 

Plain, simple, one single image of 20" ISO 1600 F/2.8 with the moon to the west of me (right hand side and slightly behind me) 

So, what did I learn on the night?

  • Pay more attention on my pre planning visit  - I used night view on PhotoPills but I think my smartphone GPS compass was weak and so where I thought the milky way would be and where it was in reality on the night - were two different things by quite some margin
  • Don't try to do milky way shots after the moon has gone 50% towards or from a full moon. It is just way too bright - or I should have used my Optolong L Pro clip in filter to try an reduce the moon glow - but this would have necessitated taking longer images. Tricky in those windy conditions. 
  • my orb is too bright and stark. I need to dampen and diffuse its glow somehow before the next trip - any ideas? Drop me a comment below .... please 😧
  • shoot a number of different lights combinations e.g. 30 x 20" at ISO 1600 F/2.8, for example
  • remember to use the histogram to try and judge the best camera settings - yep I forgot to 😡 so serves me right! 
  • do some more research about landscape composition - leading lines etc. I have done a post on composition so I should have known better! 
At the end of the day ....did I have fun
Yes I did!

Did I learn lots of new things? 
Absolutely?

Have I made some progress above where I was before? 
Yes, definitely, small steps, but progress nonetheless. 

So, which of the photos above do you like most and why? Which do you think is the worst and why? What tips would you give me to help me further on my learning journey? 

As always, drop me a comment. Help me and other fellow readers progress our beginner skills. It will be appreciated, promise. 

Meanwhile, clear skies to you all, stay safe, take care out there and enjoy

Steve 



Friday, 4 April 2025

First milky way images of 2025

 So, we took our motorhome 'Bryony' (it was going to be named 'Brian' after the snail in The Magic Roundabout. But, the motorhome didn't look a 'Brian' - more a 'Bryony! So there's the story. Our old caravan was 'Florence'; our car is 'Zebedee'. You can see a theme here! Sixties child! Sorry I digress!) down to Charmouth for a week. 

A combined trip - fossil hunting for the Boss and trying to catch the first rising of the galactic core in the Milky Way for me. 

Wow. There's some light pollution down at Portland and Weymouth! 

The two images below are the same data - 12 x 20" at ISO 1600 using Canon 800D (astro-modded) and Samyang 14 mm F/2.8 all stacked in Sequator and then processed in Affinity photo. The starless image was processed in SIRIL using Starnet++ but when I put the stars back in - it looked horrendous. No idea why, so I kept it starless which is a tad unrealistic isn't it. 

The bright light out to sea is, I think, the Portland lighthouse
The astro-modded camera certainly picks out the H-alpha

The starless image - broody and moody - I just cannot get SIRIL to reduce the number of stars.
You can see the image below when I did star recomposition. Infuriating and in reality, processing in affinity photo was much easier than in SIRIL and this was using the same image from Sequator! 


This post editing malarkey is hard work. Have I said that before? 😕 Sorry! 😂